Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Implement default-field-values #19001

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

ShoyuVanilla
Copy link
Member

Resolves #18938

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 22, 2025
@ShoyuVanilla ShoyuVanilla force-pushed the default-field-values branch 3 times, most recently from 4adec34 to 3b0f463 Compare January 24, 2025 16:07
@ShoyuVanilla ShoyuVanilla force-pushed the default-field-values branch 2 times, most recently from 64677bb to 88b70c8 Compare January 26, 2025 16:09
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small thing but otherwise lgtm!

@@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ pub type LocalModuleId = Idx<nameres::ModuleData>;
pub struct FieldId {
pub parent: VariantId,
pub local_id: LocalFieldId,
pub has_default: bool,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just realized we have t his in FieldData already, so we can't we reuse that instead? If we have the ID we can trivially index into the variant_data where required.

@@ -1414,7 +1418,7 @@ impl Struct {
.variant_data
.fields()
.iter()
.map(|(id, _)| Field { parent: self.into(), id })
.map(|(id, d)| Field { parent: self.into(), id, has_default: d.has_default })
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is here we can fetch it via variant_data[id] since we already have db.struct_data(self.id).variant_data anyways

@ShoyuVanilla
Copy link
Member Author

I'm rebasing to resolve conflicts 😄

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jan 27, 2025

Ah, sorry :)

@ShoyuVanilla
Copy link
Member Author

Nevermind. They were quite easy to resolve

@Veykril Veykril added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 6862329 Jan 27, 2025
9 checks passed
@ShoyuVanilla ShoyuVanilla deleted the default-field-values branch January 27, 2025 12:18
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…-default-fields

internal: backout `hir-*` changes from #19001
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

default_field_values grammar
3 participants